• Last week, I performed a routine pediatric neurosurgical procedure that went exactly as planned. The patient did beautifully. The outcome was excellent. But afterward, I did something I don’t usually do; I photographed the waste bins.

    What you see in these images is the aftermath of a single surgery. Mounds of blue surgical drapes, discarded instrument wrappers, plastic tubing, packaging upon packaging upon packaging. 

    One operation. One patient. One morning in the OR. The volume is staggering, and this scene repeats itself thousands of times daily across every hospital in America.

    How We Got Here

    The medical industry’s embrace of disposable plastics began with good intentions. In the 1960s and 70s, single-use items promised to eliminate cross-contamination risks and streamline hospital operations. No more labor-intensive sterilization of metal instruments. No concerns about inadequate cleaning between cases. Plastic was convenient, cheap, and seemingly harmless.

    But we now understand what we didn’t know then: plastics don’t disappear. They fragment into microplastics that persist in our environment and accumulate in human tissue.

    What the Research Shows

    Recent research has detected microplastics in human blood, lungs, and placentas. Most alarmingly for my work, a 2025 study published in Nature Medicine found microplastics accumulating in human brains at concentrations higher than in any other organ, with levels increasing 50% over just eight years.

    Research is increasingly linking plastic exposure to inflammatory responses, endocrine disruption, and neurodevelopmental effects. These are the very systems I work to protect in my young patients.

    The Children’s Burden

    When I operate on a child’s developing brain, I’m acutely aware that children face unique vulnerabilities. Their nervous systems are still forming, their blood-brain barriers are more permeable, and they have decades ahead to accumulate environmental exposures.

    The plastics breaking down from today’s surgical waste will persist in the environment long enough to affect these same children throughout their lifetimes. Studies have linked microplastic exposure to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction—mechanisms that could undermine the very neurological outcomes I’ve worked to preserve through surgery.

    What’s Actually Necessary?

    The sheer quantity of plastic in modern surgery often feels excessive. A single surgical gown comes wrapped in plastic. The sterile drapes covering the patient are plastic. The tubing, syringes, basins, suction devices, cautery pencils, light handle covers. Nearly everything within the sterile field is designed for one-time use.

    I’m not arguing that all of this is unnecessary. Sterility and patient safety are non-negotiable. But I do question whether we’ve created a system that reflexively defaults to disposable without adequately evaluating alternatives.

    Many of the supplies used for surgeries are made of single-use plastic, including items like surgical gowns.

    Some items genuinely require single-use design for infection control, such as needles. 

    Yet many don’t. 

    The surgical instruments I use, including the delicate microscissors and forceps essential to neurosurgery are metal, reusable for hundreds if not thousands of cases. They are sterilized between cases without any compromise to safety. 

    We’ve proven that high-quality reusable equipment can meet the strictest sterility standards. So why has nearly everything else in the OR become disposable?

    Why Change Is Hard

    Part of the answer is institutional inertia. Hospitals have built entire supply chains around single-use products. Switching to reusable alternatives requires upfront investment in sterilization infrastructure and workflow redesign.

    There’s also liability anxiety, the fear that reusable items might somehow increase infection risk, despite decades of safe use for surgical instruments. The cost of continuing down this path is becoming impossible to ignore. Beyond the environmental burden, we’re seeing emerging evidence that plastic pollution represents a genuine public health threat, particularly to the developing brains of children.

    What Would Change Look Like?

    It starts with honest evaluation. Every item in the surgical field should justify its disposability. 

    • Can this basin be steel instead of plastic? 
    • Can this drape be laundered rather than landfilled? 
    • Can manufacturers design packaging that doesn’t require four layers of plastic wrap?

    Change also requires collaboration across disciplines, surgeons, hospital administrators, supply chain managers, and infection control specialists working together to identify opportunities for waste reduction without compromising care.

    Looking Forward

    When I look at these photos of surgical waste, I see both the challenge and an opportunity. We’ve created a system that prioritizes convenience, and it’s time to build one that prioritizes sustainability alongside safety.

    Understanding surgical waste offers both a challenge and opportunity to prioritize sustainability alongside safety.

    My pediatric patients deserve both excellent surgical care and a livable future. These children, who will hopefully live for decades to come, will inherit a world shaped by the choices we make now. When microplastics from today’s discarded surgical supplies persist in the environment for centuries, potentially contributing to the very neurological conditions I treat, we’ve created a tragic irony.

    Every bin of plastic waste is a reminder that our commitment to their health must extend beyond the operating room and into the broader environment that will shape their developing brains and bodies for decades to come.

    We can do better. We must do better.

  • My ability to care for complex critically ill patients at one of my health system’s regional referral centers is made possible by plastic. The practice of Interventional Radiology has benefited from the healthcare plastics revolution of the last generation. Much of the tools commonly used in both routine and cutting-edge procedures are made possible by plastic.

    I also recognize that I benefit from this healthcare revolution as well as my patients. Wearing plastic contact lenses for nearly 50 years affords me precise eyesight, allowing me to manipulate catheters and wires measured in millimeters.

    The effects of microplastics on human physiology, the plastic waste generated by healthcare and its effect on the environment are a natural byproduct of the advances in medicine. I have found that it is harder to ignore the effects of plastics on people and the environment.

    The Scale of the Problem

    The healthcare industry is responsible for 7-10% of global carbon emissions (Picano et al., 2022). Radiology is a large contributor due to the high energy use of imaging equipment and the necessity of single-use equipment that is often encased in layers of plastic packaging (Woolen et al., 2023).

    Interventional Radiologists pride themselves in being creative problem solvers who apply cutting-edge technology during minimally invasive procedures to improve patient’s quality and quantity of life. When I examined my workplace environment, I recognized that the infrastructure needed to provide care to our patients was part of the problem.

    What the Numbers Show

    IR significantly contributes to medical waste through high volume of short cases and frequent use of single-use items, many of which include excessive packaging. Single-use disposable medical supplies are the second largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in IR suites, accounting for 41% of total emissions (Chua et al., 2021).

    In an audit of seventeen neurointerventional procedures in the IR suite, Shum et al. report an average waste generation of 8 kg per case. The procedure with the highest waste burden was coiling, which produced 13.1 kg of waste (Shum et al., 2020).

    Even less complex cases, such as central access and ports, generate excess waste. Brassil and Torreggiani found that 12% of PICC set components and 14% of port set components were routinely discarded (Brassil & Torreggiani, 2019). In some cases, additional equipment was used in line with local practices and preferences.

    I performed an informal environmental audit of my own practice and realized that my practice was no different.

    Single-use disposable medical supplies are the second largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in IR suites.

    Following One Patient’s Journey

    The impact and problem of plastics is illustrated by examining the journey of one of my patients.

    Mrs. X is a 75-year-old female with osteoporosis and multiple myeloma who has a painful fracture associated with tumor within the bones of her spine. She was referred to me to perform a procedure which would strengthen the bone in preparation for spinal radiation. Although radiation would benefit the patient, one of the side effects would weaken the bone and increase her risk for additional fracture that could result in neurologic injury.

    The plan was to perform a biopsy to confirm metastatic disease and to gain more tumor material for molecular characterization, to cook the tumor within the bone using radiofrequency energy to decrease tumor burden and pain, and to strengthen the bone with titanium implants and bone cement.

    Patient Preparation

    My first stop was to our patient preparation area where a plastic IV was placed to administer fluids and medications through plastic tubing from a plastic bag. Blood pressure cuff, heart rate monitor stickies, oxygen sensor, absorbent pad under the patient, and non-slip socks are all plastic.

    Inventory and Equipment

    After seeing my patient, reviewing her chart, and answering last-minute questions, the next stop was to inventory. Amongst a sea of plastic-wrapped equipment, my technologist and I pulled the needed instruments from our shelves. There were so many boxes and containers that we needed a cart to move it all.

    The amount of materials and instruments needed often requires a large cart to move into the OR.

    The IR Operating Room

    The IR operating room resembles a typical OR with the notable addition of high-tech x-ray and ultrasound imaging equipment which provide us the “eyes” into the body that allow us to perform surgery through tiny needle holes.

    The IR suite is a sea of plastic. Plastic covers on capital equipment and computers, plastic anesthesiology oxygen delivery circuit, blue plastic drapes to maintain sterility, plastic instruments, plastic personal protective equipment, the plastic packaging, and it all goes into plastic bags and bins at the end of the procedure.

    The IR suite is often a sea of plastic materials, many single-use, that are discarded after the procedure.

    Recovery

    At the end of the operation, the patient proceeds to the recovery room. Recovery completed, the plastic patient care and monitoring items are thrown away.

    Although Mrs. X left the hospital with two small incisions, less pain, and prepared for her radiation therapy, she also left with a lifelong plastic souvenir: acrylic bone cement in her vertebra, which can never be removed.

    Looking Forward

    I am not advocating for us to return to practicing medicine in a plastic-free environment. We should continue to examine the impact of plastics and microplastics on our patients. We should continue to examine why we have succumbed to plastic bloat and to look for alternatives.

    One of the driving factors of the move towards single-use items was to decrease the spread of infection during the early AIDS era (National Geographic, 2021). Advances in technology and clinical knowledge afford us the opportunity to examine how we can reduce, reuse, and recycle.

    I am confident that the culture of innovation and technology that are the hallmarks of Interventional Radiology can be harnessed to improve patient care as well as resource stewardship.


    Sources

    1. Brassil, M.P., & Torreggiani, W.C. (2019). Recycling in IR, What IR specialists can do to help. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 42(6), 789-790.
    2. Chua, A.L.B., Amin, R., Zhang, J., Thiel, C.L., & Gross, J.S. (2021). The environmental impact of interventional radiology: an evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from an academic interventional radiology practice. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 32(6), 907-915.e3.
    3. National Geographic. (2021). Can Medical Care Exist Without Plastic? https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/can-medical-care-exist-without-plastic
    4. Picano, E., Mangia, C., & D’Andrea, A. (2022). Climate change, carbon dioxide emissions, and medical imaging contribution. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(1), 215.
    5. Shum, P.L., Kok, H.K., Maingard, J., et al. (2020). Environmental sustainability in neurointerventional procedures: a waste audit. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12(11), 1053-1057.
    6. Woolen, S.A., Kim, C.J., Hernandez, A.M., et al. (2023). Radiology environmental impact: what is known and how can we improve? Academic Radiology, 30(4), 625-630.